Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-17 12:00:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > For 0.0.4-2: > > * License > - As far as I checked the whole source codes, the license > tag should be "GPLv2+". > Fixed. > * Obsoletes > - I don't think "Obsoletes: rubygem-net-ldap <= %{version}" > is needed because rubygem-net-ldap is not imported into Fedora > yet. It has been deployed in production already -also the reason why I'm submitting the package-; it must have the Obsoletes at least for the first build/release. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review