Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-29 04:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in > > a > > > package from which pikloop depends. > > > > piklab of course :-) > > Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses. > in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot. > However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel. > > So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem > for rebuilding is resolved. > > I have not yet reviewed this fully, however, > * rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should > have no longer than 79 characters. I really don't understand, my rpmlint don't complaints! I'll fix... > * Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem > for FC5, too). Before doing this change, I'm waiting one hour or two for an answer to my question on Extras list. > * Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be > /etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam) Oups, you're right, it's a typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review