[Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431


Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |langel@xxxxxxxxxx
              Alias|                            |mono-bouncycastle




--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-11-13 11:09:40 EDT ---
About naming:
There is already bouncycastle Java package [1] in Fedora, which is why I used
"bouncycastle" as part of the name. Another option would have been "bccrypto"
(from upstream zip file name). There doesn't seem to be any official guidelines
about Mono package names, so I chose to prefix it with mono-, resulting in
mono-bouncycastle.

I'm CC-ing the Java package maintainer in case he has some suggestions about
naming / packaging of this library.

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bouncycastle

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]