Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #23 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-13 07:28:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Yes, ugly, but you said that you'd drop the "poco" toplevel package - how to > do this in a more pleasing way? Can you give an example (or reference)? Something like this will prevent the generation of the toplevel binary package: --- poco.spec.orig 2009-11-11 13:50:27.000000000 +0100 +++ poco.spec 2009-11-12 16:00:44.865027561 +0100 @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ BuildRequires: sqlite-devel BuildRequires: expat-devel -Requires: poco-devel = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: poco-doc = %{version}-%{release} - %description The POCO C++ Libraries (POCO stands for POrtable COmponents) are open source C++ class libraries that simplify and accelerate the @@ -95,10 +92,6 @@ %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%files -%defattr(-, root, root, -) -%doc MANIFEST - %package foundation Summary: The Foundation POCO component Group: System Environment/Libraries > Why the full description must be in every subpackage, may be just "poco-devel" > will suffice? OK, it will be sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review