[Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083





--- Comment #23 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-11-13 07:28:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Yes, ugly, but you said that you'd drop the "poco" toplevel package - how to
> do this in a more pleasing way? Can you give an example (or reference)?

Something like this will prevent the generation of the toplevel binary package:

--- poco.spec.orig 2009-11-11 13:50:27.000000000 +0100
+++ poco.spec 2009-11-12 16:00:44.865027561 +0100
@@ -21,9 +21,6 @@
 BuildRequires:    sqlite-devel
 BuildRequires:    expat-devel

-Requires:         poco-devel = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires:         poco-doc = %{version}-%{release}
-
 %description
 The POCO C++ Libraries (POCO stands for POrtable COmponents) 
 are open source C++ class libraries that simplify and accelerate the 
@@ -95,10 +92,6 @@
 %clean
 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

-%files
-%defattr(-, root, root, -)
-%doc MANIFEST
-
 %package          foundation
 Summary:          The Foundation POCO component
 Group:            System Environment/Libraries


> Why the full description must be in every subpackage, may be just "poco-devel"
> will suffice?  

OK, it will be sufficient.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]