Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter@xxxxxxxxx | |edu) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-13 06:27:55 EDT --- /me cries for all the ifdefing At this point you should use the simple font template. The multi style of packaging is only useful if you produce more than one font subpackage That's probably the only thing needed to bring it to "good enough" level of packaging. Though you will receive regularly packaging alerts because of the non-standard font naming (see attached file, the only pure packager alert is test #3 and it's a consequence of this font set state ; the rest needs relaying upstream) I hope STIX finally publishes a non-beta version so we can tell TeXies to drop this kind of gross legacy font hack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review