Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-28 20:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'll take this one. > > A few questions: > > - can we change the jar commands to not have -v flags? Or did you want them to > have this? Sure, I'll remove the -v flags. > - can/should any of the included zip/jars be split out into separate packages? > I'm thinking about tinyXML here; is it developed by the MegaMek developers? No, I don't think it would be worth it. tinyXML is designed to be embedded in applications. Also, because MegaMek is a standalone game, and not a library, bundling these small jars, will not pollute the packaging namespace. If it turns out that other applications want to use one of MegaMek's bundled components, I'll factor it out into a separate package (though, that is unlikely, given how small and old the components are). > - collections.jar has the com.sun namespace but this is from GNU Classpath, right? Right. > - this is all redistributable, right? nist.gov and Oster<something>.com stuff? Yes: collections.jar: GPL + linking exception Ostermiller.jar: GPL getopt (bundled in Ostermiller.jar): LGPL PngEncoder.jar: LGPL TabPanel.jar: public domain tinyXML: GPL > And I know this isn't package review territory, but do we expect this to > actually work? On my rawhide-ish (probably two or three days ago) system, it > starts up and then appears to hang. I'll attach a screenshot. This may be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200653 again. If it's not already there, try adding this line to /usr/lib/security/classpath.security: securerandom.source=file:/dev/random This line is included in Rawhide libgcj, but doesn't get added on update since classpath.security is modified by rebuild-security-providers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review