Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 overholt@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |overholt@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From overholt@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-28 20:06 EST ------- I'll take this one. A few questions: - can we change the jar commands to not have -v flags? Or did you want them to have this? - can/should any of the included zip/jars be split out into separate packages? I'm thinking about tinyXML here; is it developed by the MegaMek developers? - collections.jar has the com.sun namespace but this is from GNU Classpath, right? - this is all redistributable, right? nist.gov and Oster<something>.com stuff? And I know this isn't package review territory, but do we expect this to actually work? On my rawhide-ish (probably two or three days ago) system, it starts up and then appears to hang. I'll attach a screenshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review