Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #55 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-10 14:13:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > (In reply to comment #53) > > > Honestly the only real issue I see at this point is the wholesale inclusion of > > unrelated upstream projects in the coot/scheme directory. Generally we don't > > do that kind of thing; it's basically the situation from > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > > I didn't really notice before that those were separate projects; I originally > > thought they were part of coot but carried different licenses. Now I see that > > they are merely prerequisites that shouldn't be part of this package. > > > > I brought this up with upstream. My concern was that guile net-http and > guile-gui are unsupported, and goosh is part of the guile os process, and thus > isn't maintained as its own package anymore. Therefore, I figured it wasn't > worth separating them out into their own packages. Paul (upstream) has > suggested he'll just include the code as part of the coot distribution and > maintain it himself, but this was a few months ago - I'll ask him again about > this and post an update soon. OK, upstream will be removing net-http in favor of libcurl and remove the goosh dependency (instead using the guile os process). guile-gui is still maintained, so I'll package that independently and pull it in as a requirement. I'll work on that today/tomorrow, and update this bugreport once upstream removes the net-http/goosh dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review