Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-09 05:03:45 EDT --- I looked at the actual code and what the author has done is to take an earlier BSD licensed program ("tywith") and has substantially derived from and rewritten that code to produce this package. The new package is entirely licensed under LGPLv2+ with the standard OCaml linking exception. In all the files that were derived from tywith there is an acknowledgement of the earlier provenance of the code, but there are no separate files that are still BSD licensed. Therefore I have changed the license to: License: LGPLv2+ with exceptions I made the other changes as you suggested. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot-1.2.20-2.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Nov 9 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.2.20-2 - The final license of the code is LGPLv2+ with the OCaml linking exception. It was derived from earlier BSD code. - Don't duplicate the license files across base and -devel packages. - Add note to spec about inclusion of *.ml file in -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review