Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-08 09:53:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > #001: Requires > > README states : > > REQUIRED SOFTWARE: > Preferred setup: > m4, dpic (see below), TeX or LaTeX, PSTricks, dvips Added dpic, tex(latex), texlive-texmf, and texlive-dvips. > Update your Requires accordingly > > #002: Requires of Sub package - examples > > Requires: %{name} > should rather be > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Fixed. > #003: I think you are forgetting *.m4 found in the -doc directory. See below. > #004: 2 directories for documentation ? > > The main package has /usr/share/doc/circuit_macros-6.61/ for its %doc > > The sub package has /usr/share/doc/circuit_macros/examples for its %doc > > I prefer that there is only ONE directory for ALL documentation. It is simply > because while giving the user more examples cases, we should not drown the user > into confusion. Problem is RPM. + cd /home/boeckb/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd Circuit_macros6.61 + DOCDIR=/home/boeckb/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/circuit_macros-6.61-3.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/circuit_macros-6.61 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /home/boeckb/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/circuit_macros-6.61-3.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/circuit_macros-6.61 Anything I install to there is blown away when the main package grabs the files from its %doc list. Any way to avoid this? See below for a possible workaround. > #005: You are missing the subdirectories found in the examples directory. > These should found their way to your -examples subpackage > > #006: the *.tex from the examples should also be added to the -examples > subpackage. It is an example (and source) how to use those symbols into one's > latex document. Would it just be easier to: %doc doc/ examples/ in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review