Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-07 21:57:49 EDT --- The package in comment 14 fails to build for me: + cd /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ipmiutil-2.4.3-1.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8 + gzip -f '*.8' gzip: *.8: No such file or directory I'm not sure what's gone wrong, but do note that you shouldn't try to compress the manpages yourself; rpmbuild will do it automatically. The %ifarch doesn't seem at all relevant to Fedora, and I have to admit that I can't understand why you would define all of those macros that are pretty much the same as existing macros or are longer than the strings they replace. I don't understand the purpose of %pre; packages cannot produce output in scriptlets, so the whole thing seems to be pointless. And the checks for SuSE and Montavista in %post have no place in Fedora. Many other portions of the scriptlets don't seem relevant to Fedora. Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package which builds. I checked the account system and it looks like you are not in the packager group, so I've indicated that you need a sponsor. Please read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers for more information on becoming a Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review