Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #11 from Ionuț Arțăriși <mapleoin@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-06 12:22:58 EDT --- After talking a bit more with folks on #fedora-devel concerning the "umbrella" package issue, it seems there's no need for a -devel subpackage, since the whole unittest package is a developmental one (another good example is gcc). So I removed it altogether and now everything is in the main unittest package. The obligatory rpmlint warnings are there, of course, but they should be ok: $ rpmlint unittest-0.50-62.6.fc12.x86_64.rpm unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libunittest.a unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unittest/ExistingBase.hpp unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unittest/Registry.hpp unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unittest/UnitTest.hpp 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest.spec http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest-0.50-62.6.fc12.src.rpm I'll wait for another go ahead from you before making the CVS request since this is probably not the little change you had in mind when approving :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review