[Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564





--- Comment #11 from Ionuț Arțăriși <mapleoin@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-11-06 12:22:58 EDT ---
After talking a bit more with folks on #fedora-devel concerning the "umbrella"
package issue, it seems there's no need for a -devel subpackage, since the
whole unittest package is a developmental one (another good example is gcc).

So I removed it altogether and now everything is in the main unittest package.

The obligatory rpmlint warnings are there, of course, but they should be ok:

$ rpmlint unittest-0.50-62.6.fc12.x86_64.rpm 
unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libunittest.a
unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/unittest/ExistingBase.hpp
unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/unittest/Registry.hpp
unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/unittest/UnitTest.hpp
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest.spec
http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest-0.50-62.6.fc12.src.rpm


I'll wait for another go ahead from you before making the CVS request since
this is probably not the little change you had in mind when approving :).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]