Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-06 08:49:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I did not read the guidelines [1] as requiring a gem. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Packaging_for_Gem_and_non-Gem_use Some trouble happens when someone else want to use ffi gem on Fedora and will try to import ffi gem package into Fedora. In such cases, current Fedora guideline requests that gem based rpm (i.e. rubygem-foo rpm) must be created first and non-gem support (i.e. ruby-foo) must be created as the subpackage of rubygem-foo. gem has some additional usages (although many of them can be replaced by rpm usage) and generally creating rpm from gem (if available) is preferable. (In reply to comment #2) > 0.5.2 > is released, If 0.5.2 is already released formally, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review