Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #5 from Krzesimir Nowak <qdlacz@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-05 10:31:33 EDT --- In the end I decided to: - leave documentation and doxytagfile in original place, that is - %{_docdir}/libvtemm-1.2/. - put .devhelp2 file to gtk-doc dir, that is - %{_datadir}/gtkdoc/html/libvtemm-1.2/. - leave examples in original place also, that is - %{_datadir}/libvtemm-1.2/. So: - docs package depend on gtk-doc, instead of devhelp. - packaging is easier, because I don't have to process certain files (.devhelp2, .pc, .tag) with sed to set new paths. - documentation sits where it should, that is - in %{_docdir}. With this, docs are still readable by devhelp. About other tools I don't know - they could use .devhelp2 file sitting in path they are reading. new spec: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm.spec new srpm: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc11.src.rpm new koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789971 new rpmlint outputs: libvtemm.spec: libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc11.src.rpm: libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: libvtemm-debuginfo-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: libvtemm-devel-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: libvtemm-docs-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review