[Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083





--- Comment #14 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-11-04 18:16:20 EDT ---
What's the rationale for breaking the package into so many subpackages in
revision 3? I understood that a separate poco-mysql made sense because that
part is of poco is not always used and it drags in a mysql dependency. But what
benefit does it bring to split -xml, -net, -netssl, -zip? Isn't it taking it a
bit too far?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]