Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-04 07:05:31 EDT --- * The package naming guidelines answer your question: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#MultiplePackages > Having API docs without devel package does not make much sense. Sure it does! One can read documentation and evaluate an API without needing to install -devel package dependency-chains. One could even create a Documentation spin, which would not be possible with superfluous unresolvable dependencies on -devel packages. > # Documentation is moved from its original directory to one > owned by gtk-doc. > # Why it is done is unclear for me. > Requires: gtk-doc Um, what? That comment caused some head-scratching. It's *you* who moves the documentation during %install. As why you do that, one reason for moving it from %_docdir to gtk-doc's place is to make it available to the "devhelp" tool. > %install > rm -rf %{buildroot} docs-to-include > rm -rf %{buildroot} The second one is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review