[Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527


Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |steve.traylen@xxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |steve.traylen@xxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx>  2009-11-03 17:19:30 EDT ---
Review of globus-gass-server-ez:

Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786494

yes: rpmlint
$ rpmlint SPECS/globus-gass-server-ez.spec \
        RPMS/x86_64/globus-gass-server-ez-* \
        SRPMS/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm
globus-gass-server-ez-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
globus-gass-server-ez-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

yes: package named as per-globus.
yes: spec file correct.
yes: globus guidelines good.
yes: ASL 2.0 in .spec
yes: contents is also ASL 2.0
yes: GLOBUS_LICEENSE include.
yes: english .spec
yes: legible spec.
yes: upstream matches.
$ diff --recursive  --brief globus_gass_server_ez-2.5
~/globus/gt4.2.1-all-source-installer/source-trees/gass/server_ez/source/
Only in globus_gass_server_ez-2.5: GLOBUS_LICENSE
which is expected.
yes: compiles , see koji above.
yes: builds on all archs.
yes: builds on all archs.
yes: build dependencies sane.
yes: no locales anyway.
yes: ldoconfig called correctly.
yes: no statics.
yes: owns all directories.
yes: no duplicate files.
yes: all %defattr.
yes: %clean is cleaned.
yes: contains code.
yes: no large docs anyway.
yes: doc not needed.
yes: headers are in devel.
yes: pkgconfig required.
yes: devel does require base explicitly.
yes: no gui.
yes: owns all files or directories or pulls them in.
yes: %install is cleaned.
yes: utf8.

yes it's a very boring package.

APPROVED.

Steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]