Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 pertusus@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus@xxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-09-27 17:37 EST ------- * The files %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING and %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/NEWS are needed at runtime, they shouldn't be rm even though they are duplicates. * I think that COPYING.LIB shouldn't be shipped since there is no file covered by the LGPL (if I'm not wrong). * I think that libtool isn't needed as BR now. * libXmu-devel and libXpm-devel are dependencies of libXaw-devel. apart from the non-UTF8 warnings for info files, there is an error: E: ddd file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/ddd-3.3.11/ddd/Ddd I agree with you that it is sufficient and although it would be better to have Ddd below %_sysconfdir, this is something for upstream, and certainly not a blocker. When I start ddd I have the following warnings on the console: Warning: Cannot convert string "-*-symbol-*-*-*-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-adobe-*" to type FontStruct (Annoyed? Try 'Edit->Preferences->General->Suppress X Warnings'!) Warning: XmStringGetNextComponent: unknown type 164801264 Warning: XmStringGetNextComponent: unknown type 164801312 Any idea on what cause them, and how harmfull the corresponding issues are? (in general I tend to ignore such warnings, they are most of the time caused by something else than the package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review