Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-02 13:51:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Please create one srpm per one gem. These gems do not distribute very well separately, they have the same upstream and one requires the other in a %{version}-%{release} specific manner. > - Also, you must not strip rebuilt binaries and create debuginfo rpm > correctly. Please refer to: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C I don't know how to resolve the inclusion of a reference to the buildroot in the binary blob (I did know how to make it disappear in the included Makefile, but not the blob): """ + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot Binary file /home/jmeeuwen/devel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-1.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/ruby_debug.so matches Found '/home/jmeeuwen/devel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-1.fc12.x86_64' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eZZmKv (%install) """ > - Also unless unavoided I don't think to add || : for test results. > If test fails, you should debug it first. I've fiddled around with it a bit and it now seems OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review