Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-01 10:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > A safe way would be to place the two > script files in their own subpackage, for example opennhrp-ipsec, and have this > one conflict with ipsec-tools < 0.8 but that seems a bit overkill. ... However from your comment without this opennhrp seems completely useless. > Do you have a particular configuration in mind that would work by default and > still be safe? I cannot think of any. - Please don't think that (potential) reviewers know more things about a submitted package than the submitter of the package. However reviewers expect that the submitted package works on Fedora "as it is" (Of course there are some packages which needs some initialization after being installed, however this package is not in the case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review