Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-11-01 07:29:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Replying to some comments from previous (deadreview) bug (Bug 472793) > > Notes > === > $ rpmlint jgraph.spec > jgraph.spec:68: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation > > I believe this can be ignored, as it matches the template spec files in the > java packaging guidelines. Might be. I replaced this with Documentation, just to be on safe side. > >This is pretty much irrelevant to this package review. > > I believe it may be relevant, as otherwise your -debuginfo package is broken. > There are workarounds shown in both that bug (bug 472292) and in bug 191014. > Please fix this. Ah, sorry, you're right. I thought this was common to all Java packages, not this package's fault. Addressed in new version. > I think this package is almost done. Please post a spec fixing the above and I > will review the package. > === > > Random comments: > === > >Umm, no that's definitely not needed for review, feel free to do that yourself > >(technically, one architecture-release combination is needed and there's no > >clear reason why would they fail, nor indication that packager intends to > >create branches for these). > > When doing your CVS request, please create a branch for F-11 - its is > definitely not EOL, and is hence *supported*. F-10 is no longer required as it > will very soon be EOL. I do not need this anywhere < Fedora 13. Common practice is that if anyone else needs this, he maintains it there. Therefore, if you need the package in F-12, F-11 or even F-10, feel free to maintain it there yourself (once it's in), but the maintenance burden is on your shoulders :) That means -- it's waste of bandwidth and builders cpu cycles from my point of view, since I don't care :) > > > Fully standards-compliant (What standard? ISO 9001? Why do I (user) care?) > > > Interoperability? > > Apologies for the following rant, feel free to skip it as the current > description is good :) I won't pretend I knew what ISO 9001 is :) New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jgraph.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jgraph-5.12.2.1-3.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780977 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review