Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530275 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Kent <mkent@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-31 01:39:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This package (rubygem-erubis) is APPROVED by mtasaka > ----------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the review. > > For F-12, first please request rel-eng team to make > rubygem-abstract-1.0.0-2.fc12 tagged as f12-final (at: > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ if unsure add me to CC list) > because F-11 rubygem-abstract-1.0.0-2.fc11 is now included in > F-12 build tree. > > [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f12-build rubygem-abstract > Build Tag Built by > ---------------------------------------- -------------------- > ---------------- > rubygem-abstract-1.0.0-2.fc11 dist-f11-updates mkent > [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f12-updates-candidate > rubygem-abstract > Build Tag Built by > ---------------------------------------- -------------------- > ---------------- > rubygem-abstract-1.0.0-2.fc12 dist-f12-updates-candidate mkent Sorry, still learning the release process. Reading https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-October/msg00007.html makes no mention of new packages in the criteria. Nor does reading the open rel-eng tickets. Should I wait on rubygem-abstract/rubygem-erubis until f12 updates are reopened? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review