Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-27 06:51 EST ------- Before checking 0.8.1-2; Well, in fact I did not get the rpmlint complaint (in comment #2) by "rpmlint toped-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm". However, when I once install toped and check this by "rpmlint toped" (I knew it recently that rpmlint can be used for installed packages), those rpmlint warnings appear. I don't know why these rpmlint does not appear on binary rpm, however, these warnings are indeed _TRUE_ because: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [root@localhost ~]# ldd -r /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f33000) libglut.so.3 => /usr/lib/libglut.so.3 (0x006a4000) ................... libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x078a3000) undefined symbol: Properties (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZNK5DBboxmlERK3CTM (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN9polycross11segmentlistD1Ev (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN8SGBitSet3setEt (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN5DBbox9getcornerEh (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) ................................ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- so something is surely wrong about linking libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review