Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 --- Comment #3 from MarbolanGos <marbolangos@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-30 09:27:02 EDT --- Hi, thank you for those fast answers. I am in touch with the upstream and I will suggest it. - You don't need to include AUTHORS and COPYING separately. Where did you get them, anyway? I included them as in the archive there is no information about the authors or copyright information. For the authors, they are the scientific articles published for the software (see : http://code.google.com/p/packmol/). For the copying, I took the plain text file given in this link : http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html which is given in the googlecode page. For the compilation flag, I will remove it. I have a question concerning the packaging now. Do I have to modify the existing packmol-0-0.1.02Sep09.fc11.src.rpm or do I have do create a packmol-0-0.2.02Sep09.fc11.src.rpm ? Thank you, Fabien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review