Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531648 --- Comment #3 from Andrew McNabb <amcnabb@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-29 14:33:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Anyway, I think it's a disservice to users that the setuptools package doesn't > > include easy_install. > I want to stick as close as possible to the python 2 version of the package, so > I'd suggest taking that up as a separate bug report against that package. I actually did once, as bug #510659. The action to move easy_install from python-setuptools to python-setuptools-devel was made in response to bug #240707. I'll reopen my bug report and give some more detailed information, but that really doesn't have any bearing on the python3-setuptools package. The python3-setuptools-devel package has two files: 1) /usr/bin/easy_install-3: a 9 line script that imports and runs pkg_resources.load_entry_point 2) /usr/lib/python3.1/site-packages/easy_install.py: a 5 line script that loads and runs setuptools.command.easy_install.main The actual dependency on python3-devel happens in the setuptools libraries, not in these trivial scripts, so the python3-setuptools package is the one that should depend on python3-devel package. This is a simple matter of incorrect dependencies in the specfile, and the packaging guidelines make it pretty clear that python3-setuptools needs to depend on python3-devel (or the files it depends on need to move from python3-devel to python3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review