Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 Sven Lankes <sven@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes <sven@xxxxxxx> 2009-10-29 09:52:48 EDT --- > It is, because we don't ship the sourcecode. Ether convince upstream to add the > files or add one yourself. I'd prefer a single file with both license texts and > a short notice which files are under the BSD license. I cannot find any justification that this is mandatory and spot doesn't think so either: 14:45 < killefiz> spot: do I have to create a LICENSE-File for an RPM if upstream doesn't supply one (he doesn't want to add one either) 14:45 < spot> killefiz: no, it is not required. I'll upload a new spec addressing the two other issues you raised later today (unless you want me to upload as is and add fixes later). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review