Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From tadej.janez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-27 03:13 EST ------- Hi Bruno, Dennis! I've been watching this review request and the one for mondo (bug 187318) for a while and I'm really eager to see mondorescue become part of the Fedora project (Fedora Extras, in this case). The problem is, Fedora currently doesn't provide sufficient backup facilities in Core or Extras. Sure, we have rdiff-backup, duplicity, dump, tar, etc., but nothing can compare with mondorescue's simplicity and ability to do a disaster recovery bare-metal restore. I've been researching various linux lvm-capable bare-metal restore solutions and mondorescue is my best bet so far. Taking into account the aforementioned issues, we should try to be more flexible and respect the specific nature of bare-metal restore process and try to work together, especially if the current upstream maintainer and lead developer of mondorescue is taking time to package mindi and mondo according to Fedora Extras Guidelines. Best regards, Tadej -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review