[Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282


José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #24 from José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx>  2009-10-28 14:25:10 EDT ---
Good:

- rpmlint checks returns

calibre.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/calibre/fonts/prs500/tt0419m_.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationMono-Regular.ttf
calibre.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/plugins/pictureflow.so 0775
calibre.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/plugins/podofo.so 0775
calibre.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/plugins/pdfreflow.so 0775
calibre.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/plugins/fontconfig.so 0775
calibre.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/plugins/lzx.so 0775
calibre.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/calibre/fonts/prs500/tt0003m_.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf
calibre.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/plugins/cPalmdoc.so 0775
calibre.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/calibre/fonts/prs500/tt0011m_.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf
calibre.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/plugins/msdes.so 0775

The dangling links are commented in the spec and there is nothing else to add.
:-)

The problem with the non-standard-executable-perm is the following:

$ rpm -qp --provides calibre-0.6.19-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm
cPalmdoc.so()(64bit)
config(calibre) = 0.6.19-3.fc12
fontconfig.so()(64bit)
lzx.so()(64bit)
mimehandler(application/epub+zip)
mimehandler(application/x-sony-bbeb)
msdes.so()(64bit)
pdfreflow.so()(64bit)
pictureflow.so()(64bit)
podofo.so()(64bit)
calibre = 0.6.19-3.fc12
calibre(x86-64) = 0.6.19-3.fc12

Not that all the so's that show up above also appear below, that is the
problem. This should be fixed.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPLv3) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in American English
- source matches upstream after the removal of the problematic parts as
explained in the spec file.
sha256sum 5f6366327de00adbf2b8bb2e1c4008b8d2620a8a85089aa4930a2a22511a3778

- package compiles and builds on devel (x86_64)
- locales are correctly handled
- owns all directories that it creates
- .desktop files are correctly set
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- not relocatable
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok (other than the above problem)
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime

With the non-standard-executable-perm issue fixed this package is APPROVED.

There is no need to post the correction here I trust that you will do it on
import. Meanwhile as discussed above I will sponsor you. Well done, nice job
with this "enfant terrible". :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]