Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530568 --- Comment #3 from D Haley <mycae@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-24 11:24:47 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/ghmm-4.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/ghmm-0.7-4.svn2286.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint: $ cat tmp Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghmm-0.7-4.svn2286.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ghmm-0.7-4.svn2286.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ghmm-static-0.7-4.svn2286.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ghmm-devel-0.7-4.svn2286.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ghmm-debuginfo-0.7-4.svn2286.fc10.i386.rpm $ rpmlint `cat tmp | awk '{print $2}'` ghmm.src:94: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep -e 's|$(PYTHON) setup.py install.*$|$(PYTHON) setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}|' \ ghmm.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libghmm.so.1.0.0 exit@xxxxxxxxx ghmm-static.i386: W: no-documentation ghmm-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ sudo rpm -i ../RPMS/i386/ghmm-0.7-4.svn2286.fc10.i386.rpm $ rpmlint ghmm ghmm.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libghmm.so.1.0.0 exit@xxxxxxxxx ghmm.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libghmm.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The unused direct-shlib comes from the usage of gsl-config and can be safely ignored. koji: F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1766163 > - wait for answer about static libs This is not a problem unless the main package ships static libs, and no dependant packages are made that use the -static subpackage -- its for end user-developers only. Some discussion on the topic is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-mingw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00391.html >- spurious-executable, non-utf-8 > reduce rpmlint output. Fixed >- rename spec file to %{name}.spec Not required -- name is already %{name}.spec, as seen inside the SRPM. The -revision bit is only how it is loaded onto my webserver. just mv it when you wget/curl it. >- delete CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" again :((( Done. >- maybe find a way for building the test suite… :( It builds -- but a couple of tests fail, triggering a make failure. Upstream has been notified at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2842847&group_id=67094&atid=516867, however no response from upstream as yet. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review