Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208116 Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-26 14:21 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint of source RPM ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint of binaries RPK ok. + Source in RPM matched with upstream. + Local execution of a simple text script works. + Mock build works fine. + Package contains license (CPLv1) in verbatin form. Bad: - rpmlint of install oorexx-libs produced a lot of Warning like: rpmlint oorexx-libs W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxDeregisterFunction W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxVariablePool W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxRegisterFunctionDll W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 TheNilObject W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 RexxTerminated W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 ProcessLocalActs W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 _Z12ApiRexxStartlP9_RXSTRINGPcS0_S1_lP10_RXSYSEXITPsS0_ W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 dlerror ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review