Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-26 14:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Is active_support really required? I don't see anything in the code that uses it. Yes, it is .. $sitelibdir/active_record.rb requires it and gets grumpy if it's not there. Since active_support modifies some of the core classes, users of active_record can (and should) expect those additional methods to be there, no matter how active_record was installed (tarball, gem, or rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review