Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530251 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-22 22:20:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Would adding a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ pointing to /usr/lib/gearbox mitigate > this? Technically it would, but this is not the way how "system wide installation" is supposed to work. These libs are ordinary shared libs => They belong into %{_libdir}. > Or is it better to just put everything in /usr/lib? Yes, putting them into %{_libdir} is the way to go. > Also, once everything is in /usr/lib, ldd finds the depends just fine without > adding them to the .pc file explicitly. *.pc's have nothing to do with ldd. *.pc's are helper files to aid compile-time linkage (invoking ld/gcc). ldd is a tool to check how ld.so* would treat them at run-time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review