Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #21 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-22 11:38:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Just a few comments (I'm no sponsor anyway ;)): I do not need a sponsor. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=866 > > rpmlint output is not clean. > > - Take a look to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath for the > error with rpath > - use %configure instead just ./configure > > - Doesn't the folder /usr/share/xpaint/include/ belongs to /usr/include/xpaint? > At least this folder should go into a -devel subpackage. > What about the c_scripts folder? It it needed at runtime? > The question is whether we need a devel package or not. Originally, all .c and .h were in a devel subpackage. However, xpaint allows one to write plugins in C, and Andrea suggested the suppression of the devel package, as I understood. I will take a look at version 2.8.5 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review