Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-22 05:27:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > 3. Some of the files in bitmap-console-fonts declare their name as > > "console8x8.pcf" which is almost certainly a bug > you are talking about fontname, or file name I'm talking about fontname as used by fontconfig (fc-query with the pkgkit format as used to generate rpm font metadata) > > 4. The Lucida Typewriter fonts in bitmap-fonts should be pushed in a > > bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts subpackage > in that case, bitmap-fonts rpm will be empty? It is perfectly possible to have a srpm that only generates subpackages with different names. rpm will only generate a bitmap-fonts rpm from the bitmap-fonts srpm if you put some files in it > > 6. you can probably kill the common file and put each license %doc in the > > corresponding subpackage (just put the %doc line after the corresponding > > %_font_pkg call). You just need to have each subpackage require > > fontpackages-filesystem direcly > > so here we suppose to remove common package, also README will not require > and put files for each subpackage in %doc, but we dont have any for console > what to do for it? If you don't have any doc for console, I guess it will be a doc-less subpackage :) The main use of -common if when you have bulky shared documentation (very often, big pdf files in the font world) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review