Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dmalcolm@xxxxxxxx | |om) | --- Comment #18 from Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-21 17:55:31 EDT --- My understanding is that values for the License tag in specfiles should use the "Short Name" column in the table of "Good Licenses" on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing (and that not all of these are currently understood by rpmlint, so will generate a known error); further rules can be seen here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines As I understand it, it's more important to comply with those guidelines than to achieve silence from rpmlint. GPLv2 without an "or later" appears in that table with short name "GPLv2" So I believe the value of the license tag should be: License: MIT and (MIT or GPLv2) and that you should add a comment to the specfile spelling out the situation as discussed above in comment #12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review