Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #27 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2009-10-21 11:19:58 EDT --- Yes I read Chris and assumed the same Chris of course. Okay I understand there is a difference that the libs /usr/lib64/libmunge.so.2 /usr/lib64/libmunge.so.2.0.0 are in epel:munge rather than upstream:munge-libs. but when does a problem actually occur with this? Do you get an error message or something when building slurm? Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review