Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #56 from LINBIT <partner@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-21 03:58:43 EDT --- A fresh iteration of the spec is here: http://people.linbit.com/~florian/drbd.spec http://people.linbit.com/~florian/drbd-8.3.4-11.src.rpm * The license file has been removed from the subpackages dependent on drbd-utils. * BuildRequires now only contains flex (and udev, unless invoked with --without udev, see comment #20) * Unnecessary %defattr has been removed. * %{?dist} has been removed from E-V-R in %changelog. The %configure invocation is still unchanged (left in %prep) pending your feedback to Fabio's and my comments. The "service drbd status" issue is also unchanged for the time being, but will be fixed either in the init script itself, or in the binary that the init script invokes. Since you said this was not a blocker, I guess the review can continue in parallel to this being fixed. Koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1758850 (f12) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1758855 (f13) Changelog: 859be71... drbd.spec.in: remove COPYING file from subpackages other than -utils 0d9258e... configure.ac, drbd.spec.in: generate BuildRequires from autoconf 14f3c3d... drbd.spec.in: remove superfluous %defattr de045ed... Spec files: remove optional %{dist} tag from changelog 5efac56... RPM spec files: bump release number -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review