Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 Thomas Spura <spurath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura <spurath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-20 16:50:13 EDT --- Checking items, left behind last time, because of the rename: [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required Close to finish, but the rename introduced some new things ;) - use %global instead of %define, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - Group: Development/Libraries should be for libraries. These examples should be better in: Documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review