Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529404 --- Comment #8 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-20 11:59:02 EDT --- That's great news!!! I think we're getting really close, if not there, but I have two questions about the rpmlint output. Results of: rpmlint cvc3.spec cvc3.spec:98: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. QUESTION 1: Is that the right group for a Java library? Results of: rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/cvc3-* cvc3.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcvc3.so.1.0.0 exit@xxxxxxxxx cvc3-devel.i586: W: no-documentation cvc3-emacs.i586: W: no-documentation cvc3-emacs-el.i586: W: no-documentation cvc3-java.i586: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java cvc3-java.i586: W: no-documentation cvc3-java.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cvc3/libcvc3jni.so cvc3-xemacs.i586: W: no-documentation cvc3-xemacs-el.i586: W: no-documentation 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Nearly all of these warnings are dups or non-problems. The "no-documentation" ones are fine (the docs are in the cvc3-doc package), and calling exit is fine as well. The "non-standard-group" is a duplicate warning, as noted above, so the same question applies. QUESTION 2: What about this warning, though - is that a problem?: cvc3-java.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cvc3/libcvc3jni.so Is this the right way to package a Java library? I would've expected this to be in a "java-devel" package; are my expectations incorrect? I haven't delved into the rules for Java packages. I looked at the rpmls output; that looked okay. I installed and did a few simple tests - they worked perfectly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review