Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-09-26 03:38 EST ------- Thanks, Ralf for the explanation. In fact in the xpdf source there is no licence file, only a BSD copyright, so the clause cannot be removed from the licence, but we can consider that it is not an issue. * rpmlint is silent * package rightly named * after removal of files with licence which seems GPL incompatible the package is covered by the GPL, included * spec legible * upstream source match - the following files match the upstrem source: 7b22f31289ce0812d2ec77014e7b0cdf xpdf-cyrillic-2003-jun-28.tar.gz 96e058c1b0429ae1ba0b50f1784b0985 xpdf-thai-2002-jan-16.tar.gz - the following tarballs were checked manually using a diff against upsteam source to check that only files have been removed: e53ec72546bb1a010fc2a2730f6d80f5 xpdf-3.01-novms.tar.gz ba4b037ab691f8b029ec2b9820a2fb8c xpdf-chinese-simplified-2004-jul-27-NOCMAP.tar.gz 697e7edc09a285115b597ab03f2eddf9 xpdf-chinese-traditional-2004-jul-27-NOCMAP.tar.gz f759b1b9624c7364e5d5a1ab3d146597 xpdf-japanese-2004-jul-27-NOCMAP.tar.gz 276624cddd1b70c29a3ae03ddb20fb3a xpdf-korean-2005-jul-07-NOCMAP.tar.gz * compiles and run in devel * BuildRequires look fine * no library * no translations * directory owning is right * %files section is right * docs don't affect runtime * desktop file correctly packaged It's incredible, but it is APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review