Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-26 02:49 EST ------- Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! Now I will try to import this to cvs. (In reply to comment #6) > Mamuro can you remove AUTHORS from %doc since it's empty ? I think AUTHORS file is not included in jd (binary) package. > > The case of missing gtkmm24, you are right. There will be less breakage via yum? Yes. Actually I installed this (jd) by using yum as following. When I want to review a package or to install some packages rebuilt by myself, * I usually rebuild it in mock, then the binary rpms are created. * Then I usually move all binary rpms (which are rebuilt by me in mock) to some directory (for me /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386) * Move to /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386, then I do: chmod 0644 *rpm ; createrepo $(pwd) ; chmod 0755 repodata/ ; chmod 0644 repodata/* then repository metadata is created (createrepo rpm is in CORE). * I have the following repository entry in /etc/yum.repos.d/LOCAL.repo: -------------------------------------- [LOCAL] name=LOCAL - locally created rpms baseurl=file:///var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 -------------------------------------- * Then I can install rpms rebuilt locally by me with yum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review