Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-18 08:32:24 EDT --- I think I got it. freeglut does not work when using a windows guest on a Fedora VirtualBox (3.0.8) host, when 3D acceleration is ENABLED. Disabling 3D acceleration brings everything back to normal, but depending on the application, it can become very slow. It does not matter whether the application is cross-compiled or not. In a native windows, freeglut works as long as glut 3.7 is out of the way. This is my review: rpmlint produces some warnings, but according to the mingw guidelines, all of them are acceptable: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW rpmlint mingw32-freeglut mingw32-freeglut.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglut.dll.a mingw32-freeglut.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/GL/glut.h mingw32-freeglut.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/GL/freeglut_std.h mingw32-freeglut.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/GL/freeglut.h mingw32-freeglut.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/GL/freeglut_ext.h mingw32-freeglut.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglut.dll.a mingw32-freeglut.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglut.dll.a mingw32-freeglut.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. -------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Track Fedora native package versions OK: 2.4.0 in F11 and 2.6.0 in F12 2) Follow Fedora policy OK. 3) Package naming Packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name with mingw32- OK: Used mingw32-freeglut 4) Base packages Not applicable. 5) Filenames of the cross-compilers and binutils Not applicable. 6) Naming of the root filesystem OK. 7) Standard mingw RPM macros OK: Used the standard macros. 8) Dependencies OK. BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 35 BuildRequires: mingw32-gcc BuildRequires: mingw32-binutils 9) Build architecture OK: noarch. 10) Libraries (DLLs) OK: All libraries built as DLLs. 11) Do not use %{_mingw32_bindir}/* or %{_mingw32_libdir}/* in %files section Not used. 12) Manpages and info files None. 13) Static libraries None. 14) Stripping %global __strip %{_mingw32_strip} %global __objdump %{_mingw32_objdump} OK: both macros are present in the spec file. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review