Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura <spurath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-18 08:11:19 EDT --- I'm also assuming that the file is under the same license as the rest of linbox, if no license is specified, so I let the rm -f .... out for now. Hmm, they are not packaged anyway. Only the tests are used now in %check, if there are licensing problems, wouldn't just remove the %check again resolve this? If there are no licensing problems, maybe the examples directory would belong to the -doc package. What do you think? I just started a discussion upstream in the linbox-devel googlegroup and let you know, what (and if) happens. [1] Also about the exit call and the patches… %changelog - %%check - patch for --cflags and --lflags in config [1] http://groups.google.com/group/linbox-devel Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/linbox.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/linbox-1.1.6-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review