[Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533


Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |steve.traylen@xxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |steve.traylen@xxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx>  2009-10-17 23:15:55 EDT ---
Review of globus-gatekeeper:

Koji Build: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1752463

YES: rpmlint.
 rpmlint globus-gatekeeper.spec ../SRPMS/globus-gatekeeper-5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/globus-gatekeeper-*
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

clean.

YES: Package name
YES: Spec file name.
YES: Follows globus guidelines.
YES: YES ASL2.0
YES: LICESNSE file included.
YES: Spec in english
YES: Spec is legible.
YES: Source matches.

$ diff -r --brief globus_gatekeeper-5.0
~/globus/src/gt4.2.1-all-source-installer/source-trees/gatekeeper/source/
Only in globus_gatekeeper-5.0: GLOBUS_LICENSE

$ diff -r --brief gt4.2.1-all-source-installer/source-trees/gatekeeper/setup
~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_gatekeeper_setup-2.2
Only in /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_gatekeeper_setup-2.2:
GLOBUS_LICENSE

which are expected.

YES: Builds as per koji above.
YES: Builds on all archs as per koji above.
YES: BuildRequires are sensible.
YES: No locales present.
YES: ldconfig not needed.
YES: No system libs.
YES: It owns its own directories.
YES: Permissions are correct.
YES: %clean rm %buildroot
YES: consistant use of macros.
YES: Contains code.
YES: No large documents.
YES: %doc not needed at runtime.
YES: no devel pcakge.
YES: No static files.
YES: No .la files are present.
YES: No gui
YES: does not own files/directories owned elsewhere.
YES: %install does a rm %buildroot
YES: utf8.

Looks good and even starts.

APPROVED

Steve.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]