[Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx |ozamosi@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-17 13:55:21 EDT ---
It is with great pleasure that I can declare this version golden. Nice work!

᧱᧱᧱ APPROVED ᧱᧱᧱

You can now continue from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a

If you need sponsorship in the packager group, you can ping me after another of
your submissions reaches the “approved” stage.

I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other
fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our
organisation on the fonts mailing list.

Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool.

⇒ REASSIGNING

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]