[Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?,
                   |                            |needinfo?(ozamosi@flukkost.
                   |                            |nu)




--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-17 12:19:04 EDT ---
Very nice submission, please do more!

1. spec is ok

2. you need to use “Anonymous Pro” and not “AnonymousPro” in your fontconfig
file (use fc-query <filename> to check the name exported by a font file)

3. you've reversed the substitution rule. Since you're installing “Anonymous
Pro” you want to say “if an app asks for « Anonymous », and it is not
available, use the installed « Anonymous Pro » instead” and not the reverse

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]