Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #16 from James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-17 01:40:32 EDT --- > A package that works with both python2 and python3 ... is clearly a bad idea, and it seems reasonable to ban it in the packaging guidelines. Well it's clear to you because you don't have to do 3x the work :) ... but, yeh, in Fedora the obvious solution to this is to ban it (I've seen 3rd party repos. do it for php modules so they work with the RHEL-5 version and a php-5.3 version). > For right now, we're just doing the interpreter, and you make a great argument > for waiting to package libraries for Python 3. Right, as I said ... the problem with just doing the interpreter is that it doesn't really help anyway because very few things use no extra modules. For this reason alone I don't think you can pretend this will be a one off, it's very likely to avalanche into RFEs for everything possible to be available in both versions. So, again IMO, you need to start from that assumption not assume that you can just do a py2k package. > However, this will eventually be unavoidable ignoring Python 3 won't make it go away. I'm not saying to ignore it, we do semi-significant GCC updates every few releases which break things ... yes, python3 breaks pretty much every piece of python ever. But I'd still hope we could do all the bits that needed to be done during a single release (esp. with time to prepare for it). But as I also said, it's kinda David's problem as he gets to keep all the pieces if/when it breaks. > Is it inaccurate to summarize the rest of your concerns as: "two versions of Python will lead to user complaints" Well there was the minor bit about how everyone has to do 3x the testing :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review