Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-15 18:21:56 EDT --- This one is good technically I'd simplify the summary to “A Latin typeface inspired by feudal calligraphy” Also technically "glyph" is a better term than "char" You didn't keep the touch after the fold, it's used to keep the original file timestamp (but that do not matter as much in recent rpm as it used to before, so this is just FYI) But this is really nitpicking on my part. Ignore me if you don't want to bother So the only remaining problem is the naming. Since the author publishes two other fonts, that may be packaged someday, finding a nice prefix to identify him is necessary (unfortunately renaming packages is one thing the Fedora infra is very bad at, so if you make a mistake here you'll be stuck with it quite a long time). pschwanemann- would be consistent with apanov- but a bit long. Feel free to use this or invent a better one (or ask upstream for a better handle) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review