Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #35 from LINBIT <partner@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-15 13:50:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > > > drbd.src: W: strange-permission drbd.spec 0600 > > > > No idea. It's 0640 here. > > Interesting enough, when I unpack your rpm, it's 0600 and rpmlint catches it. > Of cource changing the permissions locally and then testing is ok. OK, I'll look into that one more time. > > drbd-bash-completion.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > > /etc/bash_completion.d/drbdadm > > > > Flagged with %config now. > > hehe Ok.. I was waiting for this one.. you can say I am a bit bastard ;) > > drbd-bash-completion.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/bash_completion.d/drbdadm I *want* to replace this on updates. It's programmable bash completion for drbdadm. This is definitely something the packager knows better than the user. > > > drbd-udev.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules > > > > Flagged with %config now. > > drbd-udev.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules As above. As it stands, would you now consider the package mature enough for sponsor review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review