Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-15 13:09:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > * Changed the "Requires" into a "Conflicts" ipsec-tools < 0.8. The use of > ipsec-tools >= 0.8 fells under the "Optional Functionality" case. Opennhrp can > be run without ipsec-tools although the user would need to write its own script > as the two ones shipped upstream use ipsec-tools. - Well, "Conflicts" means that opennhrp does not work at all if ipsec-tools < 0.8 is installed. Is this really true? Also usually it is required on Fedora that installed packages works as it is by default. As Fedora does not ship ipsec-tools >= 0.8, I would want to request that you write opennhrp-script script which works without ipsec-tools installed or with ipsec-tools < 0.8 installed and configure opennhrp.conf so that opennhrp works on Fedora by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review